← Search

Beth Goetz

Edmond, OK
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 54W–59L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Beth Goetz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-09-09 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tessa Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Traci Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Traci Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Rengstorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nanette Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-27 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Rengstorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-16 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathie Strickler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathie Strickler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-09 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-06 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tessa Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-02 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathie Strickler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.3% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
44%
11W–14L · 47.5% of games
4.0
40.5%
17W–25L · 47.4% of games
7.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 53.5% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova