← Search

Lisa Robertson

— year-end
196 matches · 95W–101L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Lisa Robertson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
L
2026-09-09 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Foisy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Rengstorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Mansell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-01 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Rengstorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rouye Choquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-30 · Smash+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Mansell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rouye Choquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-09 · Smash+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-02 · Smash+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Plant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-01 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tessa Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.2% of games
3.5
65.4%
34W–18L · 57.4% of games
4.0
39.1%
25W–39L · 44% of games
7.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 55.9% of games
8.0
27.8%
10W–26L · 40.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert