← Search

Emily Schlak

Wadsworth, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 97W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Schlak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
L
2026-07-20 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-01 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camelia Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-29 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Berris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camelia Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Michelle Simmons / Andrea Brown
2026-06-22 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ella Tople
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Kay McHolm / Andrea Brown
2026-06-17 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-01 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Berris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-27 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camelia Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-20 · A40 4.0W PM Nita · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcela Nicolae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · A18 4.0W PM Lorenzo-Pazgan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Berris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-17 · NEO/Nita/LowTriW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iuliana Nita
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.2% of games
3.5
72%
67W–26L · 58.7% of games
4.0
35%
14W–26L · 43.5% of games
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe