← Search

Kathleen Aranavage

— year-end
233 matches · 148W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Aranavage to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history233 matches
L
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Vinborg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · X18 7.0 2 MV1 Drenovsky · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Aranavage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W MV2 Gustafson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Mercuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liza Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · A18 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Vinborg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · A40 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Kanetsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · X18 7.0 2 MV1 Drenovsky · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mehul Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · A40 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
Elisabeth Rosenberg / Elizabeth Radkiewicz
2026-06-16 · A18 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Chuko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
Teams62 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
72W–24L · 60.3% of games
4.0
41.7%
10W–14L · 46.1% of games
6.5
60.6%
20W–13L · 58.9% of games
7.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 55.9% of games
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
93 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
10 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams