← Search

Diana Rode

Wilmington, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 33W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Diana Rode to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-04 · Atterbury 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Wescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Atterbury 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Wescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ursula Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Atterbury 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Gilbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · RODE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Barefoot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
Lori Keipper / Cliff Zoller
2026-07-20 · Barefoot55 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Werner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · Barefoot55 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Bastable mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · RODE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Lautenbach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Barefoot55 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Bastable mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
Kim McDonald / Roni Bonello
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Lee Ann Zierenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Lee Ann Zierenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · with Lee Ann Zierenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 54.5% of games
8.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.5% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer