← Search

Elizabeth Luth

Larchmont, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 77W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Luth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-07-18 · SOL: Mind Benders: Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mariko Abdel-Rahman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Catherine Bave / Virginia Cocke
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mariko Abdel-Rahman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-6
W
Denise Kodjo / Brooke Sanders
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darcy Froehlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5
L
2026-05-30 · SOL: Mind Benders: Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gillian Pinchin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francine Pollack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-15 · NRRC: Starstruck · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 76.2% of games
3.5
64%
16W–9L · 53.1% of games
4.0
47.9%
45W–49L · 50.9% of games
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe