← Search

Jill Campbell

Henrico, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 10W–5L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jill Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2026-08-05 · CCV Campbell · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Browne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · CCV Campbell · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kimberly Brewer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · Rockwood Park Hall · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joyce Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Belmont - Gregory · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Wayne Motley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · Belmont - Gregory · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ben Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · CCV Campbell · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katherine Mueller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · CCV Campbell · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Esther Fratkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · CCV Campbell · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elizabeth Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-01 · Belmont - Gregory · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · Rockwood Park Hall · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joyce Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · Belmont - Berens 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-03 · Belmont - Berens 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karolyn Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 56% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.7% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams