← Search

Aimee Ackermann

Louisville, KY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 31W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Aimee Ackermann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Rief mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Laura Morris / Sarah Hanson
2026-05-03 · KY/LOU/JACKSON · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Witten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · KY/LOU/JACKSON · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Mueller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-17 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stewart Lussky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-12 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN/SCHREIBER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Mueller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-10-12 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN/SCHREIBER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Mueller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-09-20 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maureen Fulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-09-14 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Justina Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-1
L
Taylor Jackson / Morgan Meyer
2025-09-13 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Denise Roby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-07 · KY/LOU/ACKERMANN · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Wallitsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Heather Long / Aaron Zhang
2025-08-26 · KY/LOU/Weina · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Hinds mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
Heather Long / Aaron Zhang
2025-08-14 · KY/LOU/Weina · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Hinds mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 54.7% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 49.1% of games
4.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 26.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova