← Search

Sarah Hanson

— year-end
99 matches · 56W–43L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sarah Hanson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Wissing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-05 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/VOSS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maureen Fulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-04 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Hinds mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Wissing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
Eric Berson / Heather Long
2026-07-18 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Wissing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cedric Boutin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Mary Witherspoon / Jennifer Murphy
2026-05-09 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Straub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · KY/LOU/MORRIS/RECHTER · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Rassiga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-07 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madeline Herring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams75 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 59% of games
4.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 53.5% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 60.3% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games
3.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.7% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams