← Search

Ben Hinds

Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 42W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ben Hinds to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ruth Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-09-04 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Hanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · KY/LOU/MCCOY · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Aaron Zhang / Mary Adamchik
2026-08-23 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Knific mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Bruneau/Ackerman · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ruth Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · KY/LOU/MCCOY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Abraham O'Coffey
2026-07-27 · KY/LOU/MCCOY · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-10 · KY/LOU/BURNETT/RICE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/CALDWELL/MCCOY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · KY/LOU/BURNETT/RICE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cruz Mario Aguero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-20 · KY/LOU/CALDWELL/MCCOY · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Zale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · KY/LOU/MCCOY/CALDWELL · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.7% of games
4.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 50.5% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.8% of games
3.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.4% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#2 Singles
14%
11 matches
#1 Singles
13%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams