← Search

Jill Spehalski

Littleton, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 131W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Spehalski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
L
2026-09-01 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adriana Vernon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · SS-LGT BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Bartels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · SS-LGT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Adriana Vernon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Susan Cheney / Sandra Schumm
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Inge Bentz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · SS-H BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adriana Vernon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · SS-H BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Kishbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
70.9%
78W–32L · 57.4% of games
8.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
72.1%
31W–12L · 57.5% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#1 Singles
9%
17 matches
#2 Singles
6%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova