← Search

Kathryn Nani

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 55W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathryn Nani to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Be.Farrell40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Diane Bosnjak King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · Be.Farrell40C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jana Inman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · Be.Farrell40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susan Potter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-03 · Di.King18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-31 · Ka.Nani40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-27 · Di.King18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · La.Holderness18M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with AP Blake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · Di.King18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-02 · Da.Rea40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Rea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · Di.King18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Holderness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · La.Holderness18M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with AP Blake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Da.Rea40M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Rea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
46.2%
24W–28L · 48.9% of games
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 49.5% of games
5.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.8% of games
6.5
31%
13W–29L · 43.2% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 33.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 24.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe