← Search

Griffin Lamb

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 143W–72L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Griffin Lamb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
W
2026-09-10 · TOC.Meeker · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Holloman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Th.Critcher40C5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rebekah Noulles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · Li.Kempf18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elise Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · Th.Critcher40C5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dina Berling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · He.Tuttle40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Holloman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Rebecca Jacobsen / Cathy Williams
2026-08-20 · TOC.Meeker · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Holloman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Kimberlie Meeker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-03 · Li.Kempf18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Jane Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-30 · Ki.Meeker18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-30 · He.Tuttle40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Li.Kempf18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberlie Meeker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · Ki.Meeker40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Gyovai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72%
77W–30L · 59.9% of games
3.5
36.7%
11W–19L · 47% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
24W–8L · 56.5% of games
3.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
53 matches
#1 Singles
7%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer