← Search

Kimberlie Meeker

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 116W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kimberlie Meeker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-09-03 · TOC.Meeker · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · ANP.Lowrance · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · He.Tuttle40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Holloman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Li.Kempf18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Tuttle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-27 · TOC.Meeker · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Jane Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · ANP.Lowrance · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Griffin Lamb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-04 · ANP.Lowrance · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Li.Kempf18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elise Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · TOC.Meeker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Gyovai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · He.Tuttle40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Tuttle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Li.Kempf18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Griffin Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
13W–0L · 77.6% of games
3.0
66.7%
28W–14L · 55.7% of games
3.5
65.9%
29W–15L · 57.8% of games
5.5
100%
12W–0L · 76.6% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 71% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 65.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
48 matches
#1 Singles
24%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
29 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer