← Search

Rick Moore

— year-end
139 matches · 67W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rick Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-05-03 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Kissell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Eric Rodriguez / Cobie Frank
2026-04-19 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Kissell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-11 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-29 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Nick Nieset / Thomas Nguyen
2026-03-15 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Kissell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-14 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Christopher Esber / Joseph Holland
2026-03-01 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Paul Zurawick / James Martin
2026-02-21 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-14 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-01 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Kissell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
48.2%
67W–72L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
29 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer