← Search

Jim Jackson

— year-end
76 matches · 35W–41L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jim Jackson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-04-11 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-29 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chip Huth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amit Pendse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oliver Eskander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
Christopher Esber / Joseph Holland
2026-03-01 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Paul Zurawick / James Martin
2026-02-21 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-14 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-31 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-14 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-06 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
Teams15 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
46.1%
35W–41L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams