← Search

Leslie Holman

— year-end
167 matches · 84W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Leslie Holman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-05-03 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · Wedgewood · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-07 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · with Wendy Bull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Wedgewood · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-24 · Wedgewood · #2 Doubles · with Iryna Ferritto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-15 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-10 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · with Ashley Skop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-03 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · with Ashley Skop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-02-22 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.7% of games
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.5% of games
3.5
55%
71W–58L · 52.9% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
31 matches
#1 Singles
17%
29 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova