← Search

Laura Harrold

— year-end
77 matches · 55W–22L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Laura Harrold to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-05-11 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalia Sztryk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-08 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-04 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-27 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalia Sztryk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Gina Greco / Suzanne Davis
2026-04-26 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Castleforte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-1
W
2026-04-19 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilee Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-17 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-13 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mara Ackermann Ziminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-04-07 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · with Andrea Perlenfein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Stephanie Johnson / Marcia Tyack
2026-03-20 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilee Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-16 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Girardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1, 1-0
Teams26 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 62.2% of games
3.5
67.6%
25W–12L · 56.9% of games
6.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 60.6% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer