← Search

Ashley Skop

Powell, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 66W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ashley Skop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-05-01 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine Kiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Danielle Halligan / Michelle Wright
2026-04-17 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
Melissa Grether / Michelle Wright
2026-04-14 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · with Cheryl Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-07 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · with Cheryl Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-13 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine Kiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-10 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · with Leslie Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-06 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Elsea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-03 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · with Leslie Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-01-30 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Elsea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-13 · Wedgewood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Michelle Wright / Kirsten Gross
2026-01-12 · Racquet Club · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Guzzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.4% of games
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.7% of games
3.5
62.7%
32W–19L · 54.2% of games
4.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 57.3% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 65.5% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
12 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer