← Search

Sandra Richards

— year-end
31 matches · 8W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sandra Richards to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Bann/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tarshian Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Latasha Echols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace Bann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · Richards/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alfredo Ale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veronica Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Patricia Hayes / Michele Smith
2026-05-09 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Bunch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-5
L
2026-03-21 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Dyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-16 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bianca Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-07 · Bann/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Morgan Pippen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-08-23 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Latasha Echols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-17 · Bann/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Body
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-24 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Pacheco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Teams73 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 31.6% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 33.8% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 35.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer