← Search

Grace Bann

Cordova, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 59W–61L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Grace Bann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathlene Poulelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · Richards/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Constance Dyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-20 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathlene Poulelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Bann/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Body
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Poulelis- NC- Southaven · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathlene Poulelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-09 · Bann/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Body
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Veronica Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Richards/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Laman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
Sophia Manshack / Neal Patel
2026-07-27 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chi Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-18 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Jankov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
42.9%
27W–36L · 48.5% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.2% of games
6.5
75%
9W–3L · 62.6% of games
7.5
60%
6W–4L · 44.8% of games
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 49.5% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#1 Singles
13%
15 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer