← Search

Bianca Clayton

Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 4W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Bianca Clayton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Echols/ Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nelli Golmeeva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-29 · Richards/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Body
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Sarah Hervey / Katie Moore
2026-08-25 · Echols/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Veronica Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · Richards/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann Yackel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Bann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Vann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Latasha Echols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Nicole Hill / Griffin Lonardo
2026-06-17 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Micheal Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-15 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gloria Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Latasha Echols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-08 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Flesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-04 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hanh Vaught
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 15.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 28.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer