← Search

Stephanie Loseke

— year-end
234 matches · 139W–95L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Stephanie Loseke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history234 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Harris/PH/40&over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annmarie Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · Coffey/PH/Day3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Penn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-14 · Williams/PH 55s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Sabin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · Williams/PH 55s 7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Sabin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · Williams/PH 55s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Sabin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Williams/PH 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kolsen Mclaughlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-03 · Williams/PH 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barrett Loseke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · Williams/PH 18s 7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barrett Loseke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · Coffey/PH/3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Gulick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Williams/PH 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barrett Loseke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · Peterson/Lf 55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · Peterson/Lf 55s 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Bloomfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams71 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 45.6% of games
3.0
81%
34W–8L · 66.5% of games
3.5
45.6%
26W–31L · 48.6% of games
6.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.2% of games
7.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 49.1% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 39.6% of games
6.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 67.6% of games
7.0mixed
62.1%
36W–22L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
96 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer