← Search

Ginger Penn

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 142W–117L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Ginger Penn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history259 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Acebo/LF/40&over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Charvat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · Acebo/LF/40&over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Acebo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · Coffey/PH/Day3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Loseke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Baugher/PH 18s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · Baugher/PH 18s 7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Kelly/PH 18s 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · Nell/PH 18s 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malisa Nell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Kuehn/PH 40s 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Townsend mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
58.1%
18W–13L · 48.4% of games
3.0
58.3%
49W–35L · 54.2% of games
3.5
30%
18W–42L · 42.3% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61% of games
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.4% of games
6.0mixed
64.3%
18W–10L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
26W–13L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
62 matches
#1 Singles
6%
15 matches
#2 Singles
6%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova