← Search

Debra Combos

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 81W–119L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debra Combos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history200 matches
W
2026-09-01 · LOCH.Hoyles · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Barclay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · LOCH.Hoyles · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-04 · LOCH.Hoyles · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosanne Facktor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · TOC.Hagopian-Edwards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · TOC.Hagopian-Edwards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · TOC.Hagopian-Edwards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · LOCH.Sockett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-16 · LOCH.Hoyles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richelle Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-13 · LOCH.Sockett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-06 · LOCH.Sockett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · LOCH.Sockett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-19 · LOCH.Hoyles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
58.9%
33W–23L · 55.9% of games
3.5
23.8%
20W–64L · 40.8% of games
6.5
29.4%
10W–24L · 42.7% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#2 Singles
11%
21 matches
#3 Singles
8%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams