← Search

Theresa Bartholomew

— year-end
37 matches · 11W–26L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Theresa Bartholomew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-08-07 · Townsend 55+ 7.0 wkDAY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Holahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · ACACBartholomew · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larisa Lyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Townsend 55+ 7.0 wkDAY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · 1 ACAC Lee 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Saunders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-07-15 · ACACBartholomew · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Winckler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · ACACBartholomew · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberl Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
W
2026-07-06 · Townsend 55+ 7.0 wkDAY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberl Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · ACACBartholomew · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larisa Lyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Townsend 55+ 7.0 wkDAY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-17 · ACACBartholomew · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larisa Lyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · 1 ACAC Lee 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Follis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-31 · ACAC Blackburn · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 43.6% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe