← Search

Judy Cecco

— year-end
127 matches · 42W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Judy Cecco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-06-20 · The Young & the Rest of Us · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Berghuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · The Young & the Rest of Us · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Berghuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-28 · Whitford 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Berghuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · Whitford 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Berghuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-16 · The Young & the Rest of Us · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Krauss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-3
L
2026-05-14 · Whitford · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Krauss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-02 · The Young & the Rest of Us · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Clements
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-23 · Whitford 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-04 · Serves You Right Winter · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-14 · Serves You Right Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-01 · Whitford Tri-Level 2025 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexis Sprecher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-30 · Whitford Tri-Level 2025 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
39.2%
38W–59L · 47.4% of games
3.5
4.3%
1W–22L · 26.9% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer