← Search

Teresa Donahue

— year-end
26 matches · 6W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Teresa Donahue to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Pappas/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Stettler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-01 · Pappas/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Ragan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-16 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Theresa Heist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Terry Bondurant / Ashley Walker
2026-06-02 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Ann Carkeet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-30 · Rohlinger/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Whittington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Jamie Harris / Lisa McIntosh
2026-04-28 · Pappas/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Heist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-24 · Rohlinger/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Whittington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-22 · Pappas/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Heist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · Rohlinger/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Pappas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-15 · Ferrara/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim Badger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-09 · Rohlinger/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-07 · Pappas/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Fleenor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 51.8% of games
3.0
5.3%
1W–18L · 30.3% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams