← Search

Xiaoqun Akers

— year-end
114 matches · 46W–68L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Xiaoqun Akers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Price/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Agatha Asemota
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · Price/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tanya Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Katherine Slater / Angela Wood
2026-08-26 · Price/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melanie Sparks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Debbie Bryant / Carla Higgins
2026-08-20 · Sutton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Salina Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
Karen Franklin / Katrina Moore
2026-08-19 · Price/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charissa Derieg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Debbie Bryant / Carla Higgins
2026-08-16 · Sutton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Salina Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-05 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edgar Contreras mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Perry Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Perry Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
Lisa Evans / Matthew Beickert
2026-06-06 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Muhammad Raza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Price/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mina Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · Price/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Umsted
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams44 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 80% of games
3.0
50%
25W–25L · 50.4% of games
3.5
21.4%
6W–22L · 35.2% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 43.7% of games
6.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 36.1% of games
3.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe