← Search

Jami Feinberg

Olive Branch, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 28W–31L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jami Feinberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Brand/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Aquino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Sampson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Tidwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
Kathryn Lewis / Kate Sullivan
2026-07-28 · Tidwell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chancey Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Tidwell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keli Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-01 · Herren - NC - Southaven · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Benjamin McCrory mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-30 · Tidwell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betsy Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · Herren - NC - Southaven · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seth Herren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · Thompson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-23 · Thompson/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elza McKenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-21 · Thompson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Schrank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Bowling - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Ohrberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-09 · Thompson/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Tidwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.3% of games
3.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 45% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 25% of games
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King