← Search

Pamela Hicks

— year-end
80 matches · 42W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Pamela Hicks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-09-02 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Eubank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cassie Bourdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cassie Bourdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Brown/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meredith Koffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-20 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · Brown/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Shrivalle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-22 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · Brown/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Shipp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-08 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams57 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 58.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 40.5% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova