← Search

Beth Frame

Murfreesboro, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 42W–37L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Beth Frame to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Noi Sengsouk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Spalding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Elam Polk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-12 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-13 · Eubank/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie LaLance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronda Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · Eubank/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-08 · Eubank/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Chaffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-01 · Frame/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Chaffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · LaRoy/Lee/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · Frame/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
65.8%
25W–13L · 54.1% of games
4.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 44% of games
7.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.6% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert