← Search

Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith

— year-end
81 matches · 51W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Frame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John McCall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-29 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Phanthalangsy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
William Jones / Shannon Smith
2026-06-27 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Strickland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Lund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Collier Andress Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hollie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Segura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · Spalding/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · Spalding/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Everett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · Spalding/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Segura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
79.3%
23W–6L · 63.5% of games
4.0
32%
8W–17L · 41.5% of games
7.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 65.5% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.4% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#1 Singles
12%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova