← Search

Tammy Tegler

— year-end
281 matches · 124W–157L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tammy Tegler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history281 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Hohlen Tegler · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
Stacy Pickering / Maria Garcia
2026-08-24 · Ernst · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terri Dunlap
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Hohlen Tegler · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Carmine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · Leehy Tegler · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Talor Wain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · NE/VuuTegler/18&Over8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacob Tegler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · Leehy Tegler · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joseph Plachy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-10 · NE/VuuTegler/18&Over8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Garin Leehy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · Leehy Tegler · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Talor Wain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Leehy Tegler · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zachary Tegler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · NEWC/LubbenTegler/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · Reiners · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · Reiners · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deb Bitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams76 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.3% of games
4.0
67.3%
37W–18L · 59% of games
4.5
29.3%
17W–41L · 40.5% of games
8.0
50%
16W–16L · 53.4% of games
9.0
50%
4W–4L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
32.5%
25W–52L · 43.4% of games
9.0mixed
45.9%
17W–20L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
68 matches
#1 Singles
9%
25 matches
#2 Singles
6%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer