← Search

Lesly Garcia

— year-end
63 matches · 40W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lesly Garcia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Adams Levchenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal B Craft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-17 · Levchenko · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Adams Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emma Bergmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · Lubben/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Boris Velasquez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · Lubben/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Boris Velasquez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Powell/Garcia · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · Powell/Garcia · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Hit Happens · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Bergmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · Garcia/Levchenko · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Will Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Powell/Garcia · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · Hit Happens · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · Powell/Garcia · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emma Heacock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams16 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.9% of games
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 67.4% of games
4.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 63.1% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.1% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams