← Search

Bryan Rader

Dallas, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 20W–27L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Bryan Rader to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Team 29 DAC/Sisk-Corcoran M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Bowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Safwan Hallab / Todd Johnson
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Balaji Krishnaswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Edgerton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Edgerton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cary Bazan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · RTC GABLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kermit Gable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-26 · High Point/Cooper-Alzuro M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Payn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-16 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-02-08 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carr Carothers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-07 · RTC GABLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kermit Gable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
39.5%
15W–23L · 45.3% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer