← Search

Zach Payne

— year-end
23 matches · 17W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Zach Payne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
Safwan Hallab / Todd Johnson
2026-06-27 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Stephen James / Tad Deupree
2026-06-20 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-28 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · DAC/Littlefield-Sisk M3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Haywood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Frazure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams13 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 63.1% of games
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova