← Search

Dat Pham

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 57W–77L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dat Pham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-08-30 · TOC.Merck · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Hungarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Jabusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paul Narula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Sc.Troutman40C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Casey Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · LBuyaki-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki DAmbrose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki DAmbrose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · La.Brock40M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki DAmbrose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Justin Fowler / Carrie Guthrie
2026-07-25 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nikki DAmbrose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Ken Glanville / Lisa Scott
2026-07-23 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki DAmbrose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · LBuyaki-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki DAmbrose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · La.Brock40M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Waldner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · La.Brock40M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Waldner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
42.9%
18W–24L · 47.9% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 44.4% of games
8.5
25%
3W–9L · 43% of games
4.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
48.4%
15W–16L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams