← Search

Jeff Cockayne

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 158W–61L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeff Cockayne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Sa.Perian40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Richard McClenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · Sa.Perian40C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Guillermo Velarde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · LOCH.Gloer · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Richard McClenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · Sa.Perian40C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sandeep Verghese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Joshua Ganeles / Stephen Holmes
2026-08-11 · #2 Doubles · with Lawrence Brock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · La.Brock18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mic Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · LOCH.Gloer · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Richard McClenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-06 · La.Brock40S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Sa.Perian40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mic Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · LOCH.Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-01 · LOCH.Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-01 · LOCH.Gloer · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mic Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
70.4%
69W–29L · 58.6% of games
4.5
50%
5W–5L · 47.2% of games
7.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.3% of games
8.5
90%
36W–4L · 63% of games
4.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 70.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
57 matches
#1 Singles
18%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
28 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova