← Search

Mary Feger

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 126W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Feger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
L
2026-09-14 · KMabe-HR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Spearman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheana Funkhouser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mimi Miles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-24 · KMabe-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · KMabe-HR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carrie Couto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh MacIver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Kelly Johnson / Neeta Vora
2026-08-03 · KMabe-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carrie Couto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh MacIver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · CCouto-HR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Roessler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · EWyngaarden-HR · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · EWyngaarden-HR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · CCouto-HR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eddie Blount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 48.6% of games
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 71.7% of games
4.0
77.8%
63W–18L · 61.2% of games
4.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 34.7% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
78.8%
26W–7L · 64.8% of games
8.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.4% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#2 Singles
14%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
12 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King