← Search

Michele Cunningham

HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 77W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michele Cunningham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-08-09 · SS-H YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sean Hudelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · SS-H YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sean Hudelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · RRTC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dorothy Ripka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · RRTC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Judy Kennelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-12 · SS-H TEAL · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Silliman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · SS-H TEAL · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melodie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · RRTC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Bracken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-21 · RRTC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barb Hedges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-14 · RRTC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracy Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-08-05 · RRTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gloria Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-07-27 · HG RED · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Daniel Greer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-22 · RRTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Bracken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 55.6% of games
4.5
65.1%
41W–22L · 56.6% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
75%
12W–4L · 56.7% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
29.2%
7W–17L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert