← Search

Teresa Flecky

Aurora, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 72W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Teresa Flecky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-09-01 · HRCA-N NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · HRCA-N NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · HRCA-N NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · GCC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew McCord mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
Laurie Feler / Barb Lansky
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Ham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-21 · GCC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew McCord mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Flecky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · SS-H BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Grace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.7% of games
4.0
57.1%
28W–21L · 54.2% of games
4.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 38.5% of games
8.0
65.1%
28W–15L · 58.7% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 34.3% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
40 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe