← Search

Stephanie Burt

— year-end
135 matches · 64W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Burt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-08-25 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Sandberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Woodrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juli Simmermon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · WC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Seidlitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · WC BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-21 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Roosevelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-16 · WC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with CC Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Gagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-4
L
2026-07-02 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Sandberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juli Simmermon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Gagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
60.6%
43W–28L · 54.2% of games
3.5
32.7%
18W–37L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#1 Singles
14%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert