← Search

Janice Henderson

Shrewsbury, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 15W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janice Henderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
Sally Pillay / Erika Bradley
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Eileen Goss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Eileen Goss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Dombroski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · Sophisticated Ladies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Penn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberley Cottell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-3
W
2026-06-11 · Sophisticated Ladies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Penn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Penn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Penn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · Sophisticated Ladies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
L
2026-05-20 · Dangerous Divas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Fellingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-03 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Laufenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Melinda Fellingham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
40%
6W–9L · 48.7% of games
8.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe