← Search

Eileen Goss

Red Bank, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
312 matches · 176W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eileen Goss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history312 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Shore Shots 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Eno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-10 · Shore Shots 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Shore Shots 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Vanderbeek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Sally Pillay / Erika Bradley
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Janice Henderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Janice Henderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · Shore Shots 55+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Shore Shots 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Mudditt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · Shore Shots 55+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Bellaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Karen Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-29 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Vanderbeek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Deborah Vanderbeek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · Shore Shots 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Mudditt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 43% of games
4.0
53.4%
70W–61L · 48.9% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
65.2%
60W–32L · 55.1% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
69.2%
27W–12L · 55.6% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
189 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
33 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert