← Search

Andrew Wallenstein

Ithaca, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 82W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Wallenstein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-07-19 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juliet Concilla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Nesspor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Johanna Kmetz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Nesspor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Nesspor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juliet Concilla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · Lucky Stars · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Baliker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Wei Lee / Prashant Kaul
2026-04-08 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Jay Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Adam Berg / Jason Rushing
2026-03-11 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Jay Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-13 · This is 40 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Baliker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-05 · SYR: SFTC - Wallenstein · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Nesspor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-3
L
2025-06-29 · This is 40 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Jordan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.2% of games
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 74.6% of games
3.5
65.2%
30W–16L · 57.8% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50.7%
37W–36L · 49.8% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
13 matches
#2 Male Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe