← Search

Irina Naydich

Ithaca, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 44W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Irina Naydich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Yablonski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Ashley Paolangeli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Emily Madan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Yablonski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Kohut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Haiyuan Yu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · with Seneca Thomas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Alexis Capezza / Igor Shuli
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · with Haiyuan Yu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · Yablonski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-13 · Yablonski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Falk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · Lucky Stars · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dimitri Naydich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · with Nam-Jung Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.3% of games
3.5
50%
13W–13L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
36.2%
21W–37L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer