← Search

Juliet Concilla

Manlius, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
269 matches · 132W–137L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Juliet Concilla to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history269 matches
W
2026-07-19 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Wallenstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Wallenstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with Kurt Concilla championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · SYR: Slice to Meet You · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kurt Concilla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
Anne Farella / Brian Rose
2026-03-15 · SYR: Slice to Meet You · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kurt Concilla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · SYR: Slice to Meet You · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Greg Polhamus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-11-01 · Binghamton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Cawley-Oliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-18 · Binghamton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Cawley-Oliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-08-10 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3
L
2025-08-03 · #4 Doubles · with Deborah Severino championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-08-03 · #4 Doubles · with Kim Yuhnick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Michelle Smith / Josie Stephenson
2025-08-02 · #4 Doubles · with Deborah Severino championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 69.1% of games
3.0
72.7%
32W–12L · 56.8% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
89.3%
25W–3L · 66.6% of games
7.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 55.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
17W–17L · 53% of games
7.0mixed
25%
14W–42L · 41.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
80 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert