← Search

Tammy Chapman

— year-end
64 matches · 41W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tammy Chapman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Goetsch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Carrie Siler / Cindy Miller
2026-08-20 · Goetsch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lydia Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anita Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-19 · Bethany Bounds · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Reika Sato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · Goetsch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lydia Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-05 · Goetsch/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · Goetsch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-10 · Tammy Chapman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-24 · Goetsch/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · Kelly Young 4.0 18s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-20 · Tammy Chapman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Teams81 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57% of games
4.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 53.3% of games
7.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 59.5% of games
4.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams