← Search

Mary Trotz

— year-end
80 matches · 51W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mary Trotz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-10 · White/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Yarrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · White/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · Sentilles/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maggie Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-27 · White/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Haden Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · Eason/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Koelsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Musick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Wiuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Musick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Mihalko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Jamie Harris / Lisa McIntosh
2026-05-07 · Trotz/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams45 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
68%
34W–16L · 57.3% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.2% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova